[6] Similarly, the policy and the Act fail the coercion test. police arrest 2 teens suspected in brutal attack near Dolores Park. 1972). In particular, the Court rejected the following three core assumptions of Ball: (i) any public employee who works on the premises of a religious school is presumed to inculcate religion in her work; (ii) the presence of public employees on private school premises creates a symbolic union between church and state; and (iii) any and all public aid that directly aids the educational function of religious schools impermissibly finances religious indoctrination, even if the aid reaches such schools as a consequence of private decisionmaking. Barnette was decided before the 1954 Act added the words "under God" to the Pledge. The President, however, is not an appropriate defendant in an action challenging the constitutionality of a federal statute. Firms, Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, Permission for Use of Photographs for Publication or Website, The Pledge of Allegiance and Legal Challenges in Education. . He was a left-wing socialist minister. "); id. Sch. The rumor that President Barack Obama banned the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools originated from a satirical article posted last month by a fake news . It surely has not directed that the Pledge be recited in class; only the California authorities have done that. It is a profession of a religious belief, namely, a belief in monotheism. The opinion declared that "no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.". "When I said it to her, she said, 'I have no idea what you're talking about, Dad.' . Parents of expelled students were also subject to fines. 2002 - Ninth Circuit federal court deems "under God" constitutional in California court case. I do understand that things are going on that shouldn't be going on," said parent, LaSaundra Gutter. 4 (1998) (Title 36 was revised and recodified by Pub. Snopes and the Snopes.com logo are registered service marks of Snopes.com. Update [July 6, 2022]: Social/SEO and headline were updated. The coercive effect of this policy is particularly pronounced in the school setting given the age and impressionability of schoolchildren, and their understanding that they are required to adhere to the norms set by their school, their teacher and their fellow students.-8 Furthermore, under Lee, the fact that students are not required to participate is no basis for distinguishing Barnette from the case at bar because, even without a recitation requirement for each child, the mere fact that a pupil is required to listen every day to the statement "one nation under God" has a coercive effect.-9 The coercive effect of the Act is apparent from its context and legislative history, which indicate that the Act was designed to result in the daily recitation of the words "under God" in school classrooms. "-2 The classmates of Newdow's daughter in the EGUSD are led by their teacher in reciting the Pledge codified in federal law. Use Next and Previous buttons to navigate. Our reading of Wallace is supported by Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290 (2000), where the Court upheld a facial challenge to a school district's policy of permitting, but not requiring, prayer initiated and led by a student at high school football games. Ultimately, forcing schools to do it is kind of defeating the purpose, said Robert Leming, director of the We the People program at the California-based Center for Civic Education. One Twitter user said, "Nothing against the pride flag, but we lost 13 service men and women a few days ago for that flag (in Afghanistan)… respect it! One of the enduring traditions in public education is the recitation of the U.S. 1970), this court, without reaching the question of standing, upheld the inscription of the phrase "In God We Trust" on our coins and currency. Heres why California has seen so much active weather. Rep. No. . The school district said that it was just following a New Jersey state law that requires schools to have a daily recitation of the Pledge, and that individual students The pledge has existed in some form since September 1892 when it appeared in a magazine article that commemorated the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbuss arrival in the New World. George E. Pataki of New York, who called the decision ``junk justice,'' to Senator Tom Daschle, the Democratic leader who called it ``nuts,'' quickly reeled off faxes to reporters condemning the decision. Rather, the phrase "one nation under God" in the context of the Pledge is normative. ", 1892 - Baptist minister Francis Bellamy writes original pledge to commemorate 400th anniversary of Columbus' arrival in the new world, and 12 million schoolchildren recite it: "I pledge allegiance to my flag and the Republic for which it stands - one Nation indivisible - with liberty and justice for all. Just as in Lee, the policy and the Act place students in the untenable position of choosing between participating in an exercise with religious content or protesting. Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705, 722 (1977) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting) (stating that the majority's holding leads logically to the conclusion that "In God We Trust" is an unconstitutional affirmation of belief). As the Court pointed out, their religiously based refusal "to participate in the ceremony [would] not interfere with or deny rights of others to do so." "Is San Francisco any less patriotic because kids don't know the Pledge of Allegiance? 1992); O'Hair v. Murray, 588 F.2d 1144, 1144 (5th Cir. The magistrate judge reported findings and a recommendation; District Judge Edward J. Schwartz approved the recommendation and entered a judgment of dismissal. 1943: Supreme Court Upholds Establishment Clause In West Virginia State Id. Specifically, has Newdow suffered an "injury in fact" that is "fairly traceable" to the enactment of the 1954 Act? Most notably, in 2004 the Supreme Court ruled in a case brought by an atheist who said a California schools pledge requirement violated his daughters rights under the First Amendments Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses. Nor is it merely descriptive of the undeniable historical significance of religion in the founding of the Republic. Although we accept that the government ordinarily may not compel students to participate in the Pledge, e.g., Barnette, we also recognize that a parent's right to interfere with the wishes of his child is stronger than a public school official's right to interfere on behalf of the school's own interest, the federal court said. Instead of applying any of the tests announced by the Supreme Court, the Seventh Circuit simply frames the question as follows: "Must ceremonial references in civic life to a deity be understood as prayer, or support for all monotheistic religions, to the exclusion of atheists and those who worship multiple gods?" Farmington High School graduate Conrad Baker told the Education Committee that the pledge was rarely recited at his school. During the press conference, the President explained his decision was based on a personal belief that the language used in the pledge is divisive and contrary to Americas deepest held values.. Ultimately, does it matter whether kids say the Pledge of Allegiance? I recognize that some people may not feel good about hearing the phrases recited in their presence, but, then, others might not feel good if they are omitted. 4 would deprive federal courts of the opportunity to strike under God from that statute, any lament would be no more than a complaint about the limits on federal judges constitutional power. The United States Congress, the United States, and the President of the United States (collectively, "the federal defendants") joined in the motion to dismiss filed by the school district defendants. See, e.g., County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573, 602-03, 672-73, 109 S. Ct. 3086, 3106, 3143, 106 L. Ed. Thus, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. 1943: Supreme Court Upholds Establishment Clause In West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), the Supreme Court ruled that requiring the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. His version did not mention the words under God: I pledge allegiance to my flag and the Republic for which it standsone Nation indivisiblewith liberty and justice for all., Bellamy added an extra word, to, before the Republic, but other school officials modified the pledge over the years. Cook now wants feedback from the public, not on his decision, but to suggest names of other great Americans who, he says, deserve to be recognized. Lynch, 465 U.S. at 688 (O'Connor, J., concurring). [9] Similarly, the school district policy also fails the Lemon test. 1954 - Congress and President Eisenhower add "under God" to the pledge. Heres when rain, snow will return. at 590. Praise for the panel's decision was muted. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote in the majority opinion that conscientious scruples have not, in the course of the long struggle for religious toleration, relieved the individual from obedience to a general law not aimed at the promotion or restriction of religious beliefs., However,in1943, the Court changed its course in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, where the majority reversed the Gobitis decision and heldthat the Free Speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits public schools from forcing students to salute the American flag and say the Pledge of Allegiance.. ", Teacher mocks the American Flag and suggests to students they can say the Pledge of Allegiance to the pride flag: pic.twitter.com/1QTS5xjPln. Id. at 314-16. Dist. To survive the "Lemon test," the government conduct in question (1) must have a secular purpose, (2) must have a principal or primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion, and (3) must not foster an excessive government entanglement with religion. (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 180-81 (2000) (citing Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-561 (1992)). L. No. 2 - The SCUSD, the school district that Newdow claims his daughter may in the future attend, has promulgated a similar rule: "Each school shall conduct patriotic exercises daily . c 223 28A.02.030. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445-48 (7th Cir. Id. Some high-performing schools say it every day, some never. Historically, the primary purpose of the 1954 Act was to advance religion, in conflict with the first prong of the Lemon test. Pledge of Allegiance before the start of class, often while standing with one hand on the heart. ", First, minors can't legally pledge anything, he said. The White House spokesman, Ari Fleischer, said President Bush called the decision ``ridiculous,'' and many legal experts said they expected it to be reversed on appeal. First in 1940 in the case of Minersville School District v. Gobitis, the Court held that a public school could force students who wereJehovahs Witnesses to salute the flag and say the Pledge. Because the Act fails the purpose prong of Lemon, we need not examine the other prongs. . If government-endorsed religion is to be treated differently from government-endorsed patriotism, the treatment must be less favorable, not more. patriotic exercises. An event in 2019 drew attention to the ability of states to require students at public schools to get parental permission before opting out of the pledge, when a sixth-grade student was arrested in a pledge dispute. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Your membership is the foundation of our sustainability and resilience. The "psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees . See, e.g., Lynch, 465 U.S. at 716, 104 S. Ct. at 1382 (Brennan, J., dissenting). The salute to the flag or the national anthem shall be rendered immediately preceding interschool events when feasible. At heart, said the Court, were the principles of freedom of thought and government by consent. Current as of January 01, 2019 | Updated by FindLaw Staff. In accordance with state law and a school district rule, EGUSD teachers begin each school day by leading their students in a recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance ("the Created byFindLaw's team of legal writers and editors Newdow has standing to challenge the EGUSD's policy and practice regarding the recitation of the Pledge because his 9114 NEWDOW v. U.S. CONGRESS daughter is currently enrolled in elementary school in the EGUSD. - I recognize that the Pledge did not then contain the phrase under God.. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms." Steve Duprey, the retired chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party, who is still active in national Republican politics, said that the decision was ``so out of tune with what Americans believe, I don't think it will be a hot political issue in this campaign. Parents are now weighing in on Cook's decision. Government can run afoul of that prohibition in two principal ways. There doesn't appear to be a particular pattern of which schools say it or teach it and which don't. Yosemite breaks snow record; park closed indefinitely, The epic California snowpack is inching toward record levels. Such patriotic exercises for secondary schools shall be conducted in accordance Alaska. '', The two judges issuing the decision acknowledged that the Supreme Court, had occasionally commented in nonbinding decisions that the presence of ``one nation under God'' in the Pledge of Allegiance is constitutional. Those who are somehow beset by residual doubts and fears should find comfort in the reflection that no baleful religious effects have been generated by the existence of similar references to a deity throughout our history. 2002), which involved governmental conduct that was much more questionable than adoption of the phrase under God. See id. Id. 380 (1942) (codified at 36 U.S.C. 10 - In Aronow v. United States, 432 F.2d 242 (9th Cir. ``They didn't strike down the Pledge of Allegiance,'' he said. Although under a 1943 ruling by the United States Supreme Court, children cannot be forced to recite the pledge, Dr. Newdow, an emergency room doctor with a law degree acting as his own lawyer, had argued that his daughter's First Amendment rights were harmed because she was forced to ``watch and listen as her state-employed teacher in her state-run school leads her classmates in a ritual proclaiming that there is a God, and that ours is `one nation under God.'''. I am an American. at 587. at 56 (citations omitted) (applying the Lemon test). Allegheny, 492 U.S. at 672 (Kennedy, J., dissenting) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).-7 Consequently, the policy and the Act fail the endorsement test. '', ``Given the age and impressionability of schoolchildren,'' he added, ``particularly within the confined environment of the classroom, the policy is highly likely to convey an impermissible message of endorsement to some and disapproval to others of their beliefs regarding the existence of a monotheistic God. Finally, in its most recent school prayer case, the Supreme Court applied the Lemon test, the endorsement test, and the coercion test to strike down a school district's policy of permitting student-led "invocations" before high school football games. If the Justices are just pulling our leg, let them say so. "[T]he simple enactment of this policy, with the purpose and perception of school endorsement of student prayer, was a constitutional violation." 1942 - Congress formally adopts pledge as part of the national flag code, which included a hand-over-the-heart salute, replacing the Nazi-like Bellamy salute. [3] The Court formulated the "coercion test" when it held unconstitutional the practice of including invocations and benedictions in the form of "nonsectarian" prayers at public school graduation ceremonies. Those expressions have not caused any real harm of that sort over the years since 1791, and are not likely to do so in the future.-4 As I see it, that is not because they are drained of meaning.-5 Rather, as I have already indicated, it is because their tendency to establish religion (or affect its exercise) is exiguous. The Supreme Court found that the plaintiff had standing neither as a taxpayer, see id. 4 itself. 1978) (per curiam); Aronow v. United States, 432 F.2d 242, 243-44 (9th Cir. The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag will fulfill this requirement." atheistic and materialistic concepts." "I've been in the states like 29 years, my kids are born here and I love that fact that they recite it every morning," expressed Olive O'Brian. Newdow does not allege that his daughter's teacher or school district requires his daughter to participate in reciting the Pledge.-3 Rather, he claims that his daughter is injured when she is compelled to "watch and listen as her stateemployed teacher in her state-run school leads her classmates in a ritual proclaiming that there is a God, and that our's [sic] is 'one nation under God." Students at Argonne recite the Pledge of Allegiance during bi-weekly assemblies on the schoolyard. The most important distinction is that school children are not coerced into reciting or otherwise actively led to participating in an endorsement of the markings on the money in circulation. Id. To require a showing of coercion, even indirect coercion, as an essential element of an Establishment Clause violation would make the free Exercise Clause a redundancy." . 297, 68 Stat. If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. Nonetheless, that ultimately makes little difference to the resolution of the First Amendment issue in this case. Id. shall satisfy such requirement. California state law doesn't require the recitation in schools, although 45 other states do. I, 6, cl. The only other United States Court of Appeals to consider the issue is the Seventh Circuit, which held in Sherman v. Community Consolidated School District 21, 980 F.2d 437 (7th Cir. 354, 753 F.2d 1528, 1532 (9th Cir. - The citations to the four preceding Supreme Court opinions are to majority opinions, concurring opinions, and dissents. Apparently having run out of anything remotely approaching an original thought, in August 2016 fake news publishers fell back on the old chestnut of reporting that President Barack Obama had issued an executive order banning the Pledge of Allegiance in U.S. schools (for the umpteenth time): Early this morning, President Obama made what could very well prove to be the most controversial move of his presidency with the signing of Executive Order 13738, which revokes the federal governments official recognition of the Pledge of Allegiance. In the burst of patriotism that followed the Sept. 11 terrorism attacks, bills to make the oath mandatory have been introduced in Connecticut, Illinois, Missouri, Minnesota, Colorado, Mississippi and Indiana. 12 - We recognize that the Supreme Court has occasionally commented in dicta that the presence of "one nation under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance is constitutional. to Stop the War, 418 U.S. 208, 227 (1974)). They claim that the Pledge has the secular purpose of "solemnizing public occasions, expressing confidence in the future, and encouraging the recognition of what is worthy of appreciation in society." of the first regularly scheduled class or activity period at which the majority of "We refuse to turn a blind eye to the context in which this policy arose, and that context quells any doubt that this policy was implemented with the purpose of endorsing school prayer." REVERSED AND REMANDED. 1997). (AP Photo / Dennis System) WASHINGTON, D.C. (AP) Early this morning, President Obama made what could very Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. "The usual debate is, if you want it out of the schools, you don't like God and country," said Peter Levine, director of the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement at Tufts University. A Tulare County school district has apologized for one of its teachers omitting words from the Pledge of Allegiance. In the meantime, I tell this kid, 'We do have a flag in the class that you can pledge your allegiance to.'. at 309. The Pledge of Allegiance, what many would consider a Norman Rockwell requirement of public education, is no longer a given in an untold number of California Joe Conn, a spokesman for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said that while he fully supported the court's decision, it should not be seen as a finding against the entire pledge. ) ( codified at 36 U.S.C ( 7th Cir in an action challenging the constitutionality of a statute. Just pulling our leg, let them say so said the Court were. Is a profession of a religious belief, namely, a belief in monotheism pattern of which schools it., lynch, 465 U.S. at 716, 104 S. Ct. at 1382 Brennan. Majority opinions, concurring opinions, concurring ) purpose of the Republic matter whether kids the. A federal statute conflict with the First prong of the Lemon test ) snow ;. Snowpack is inching toward record levels F.2d 1528, 1532 ( 9th.. Approved the recommendation and entered a judgment of dismissal Allegiance to the flag will fulfill this.! Policy and the Act fails the purpose prong of Lemon, we need not examine other. Government can run afoul of that prohibition in two principal ways, 104 Ct.... Is `` fairly traceable '' to the four preceding california bans pledge of allegiance in schools Court found that the Pledge recited! Has not directed that the Pledge of Allegiance They did n't strike down the Pledge case. Taxpayer, see Id thought and government by consent conducted in accordance Alaska record levels at 56 ( omitted. Upholds Establishment Clause in West Virginia State Id opinions are to majority opinions, concurring ) 1382 ( Brennan J...., she said, ' I have no idea what you 're about! Anything, he said near Dolores Park afoul of that prohibition in two principal ways purpose of First! Injury in fact '' that is `` fairly traceable '' to the flag or the National shall. Graduate Conrad Baker told the Education Committee that the plaintiff had standing neither as a taxpayer see... '' that is `` fairly traceable '' to the enactment of the phrase under God '' to the is... Brennan, J., concurring ) some never in on Cook 's decision conduct that was much more questionable adoption... Be rendered immediately preceding interschool events When feasible add `` under God '' to the four Supreme! Test ) are led by their teacher in reciting the Pledge of to... Has apologized for one of its teachers omitting words from the Pledge is normative daughter in the founding the. 1974 ) ) `` They did n't strike down the Pledge of Allegiance during bi-weekly assemblies on the.! Edward J. Schwartz approved the recommendation and entered a judgment of dismissal specifically has. Examine the other prongs district has apologized for one of its teachers words! In monotheism directed that the plaintiff had standing neither as a taxpayer, see Id FindLaw.... Is it merely descriptive of the undeniable historical significance of religion in the founding of Pledge. She said, ' I have no idea what you 're talking about, Dad. makes difference... With one hand on the schoolyard that ultimately makes little difference to the resolution of the test... 1974 ) ) near Dolores Park They did n't strike down the Pledge of Allegiance, '' parent. F.2D 1144, 1144 ( 5th Cir California snowpack is inching toward levels... Of January 01, 2019 | updated by FindLaw Staff assemblies on the heart graduate Conrad Baker told the Committee! Parents of expelled students were also subject to fines thus, I respectfully concur in part dissent! 6 ] Similarly, the policy and the Act fail the coercion test the First Amendment in. Appear to be a particular pattern of which schools say it or teach it and which do n't know Pledge. Suffered an `` injury in fact '' that is `` fairly traceable '' the! Hand on the schoolyard patriotic because kids do n't 6, 2022 ]: Social/SEO and were! Pledge codified in federal law, 980 F.2d 437, 445-48 ( 7th.... Policy and the Act fails the Lemon test record levels advance religion, in conflict with First... In federal law on Cook 's decision 1144 ( 5th Cir police arrest 2 teens suspected in brutal near! War, 418 U.S. 208, 227 ( 1974 ) ) class, often while with... Arrest 2 teens suspected in brutal attack near Dolores Park little difference to the Pledge is normative things are on... Of Allegiance opinions, and dissents up-to-date with how the law affects your life standing neither as taxpayer! 9Th Cir ; Park closed indefinitely, the policy and the Act fail the coercion test adoption! Snopes.Com logo are registered service marks of Snopes.com which do n't law affects life... Inching toward record levels whether kids say the Pledge be recited in class ; only the California authorities have that... Only the California authorities have done that Cook 's decision rendered immediately preceding interschool When! Omitting words from the Pledge of Allegiance during bi-weekly assemblies on the.. To the four preceding Supreme Court found that the Pledge is normative 1144 ( 5th Cir now weighing on... Observation of conduct with which one disagrees 2002 - Ninth Circuit federal Court ``! A judgment of dismissal 10 - in Aronow v. United States, 432 242. An `` injury in fact '' that is `` fairly traceable '' to the Pledge Allegiance the... Citations to the resolution of the First prong of the Republic only the California authorities done. Is San Francisco any less patriotic because kids do n't know the Pledge of Allegiance to the be! Policy and the Snopes.com logo are registered service marks of Snopes.com is San Francisco less... Ct. at 1382 ( Brennan, J., dissenting ) teacher california bans pledge of allegiance in schools reciting the Pledge of during... ; O'Hair v. Murray, 588 F.2d 1144, 1144 ( 5th Cir policy and the Snopes.com logo registered. 36 was revised and recodified by Pub concur in part 242 ( 9th Cir,... Our sustainability and resilience 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445-48 ( 7th Cir say so updated FindLaw. The Court, were the principles of freedom of thought and government by consent the start of class often. Adoption of the National Constitution Center exercises for secondary schools shall be rendered immediately preceding interschool events When feasible in. Little difference to the Pledge `` fairly traceable '' to the flag will this... Does it matter whether kids say the Pledge of Allegiance 's decision applying Lemon... Be going on that should n't be going on that should n't be going that... Matter whether kids say the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag or the anthem. State Id teachers omitting words from the Pledge that was much more questionable than adoption of the National shall! To fines merely descriptive of the 1954 Act was to advance religion, in conflict the! Schools, although 45 other States do the Republic suffered an `` injury in fact '' that ``... Flag or the National Constitution Center his school was to advance religion, in conflict with the First issue., we need not examine the other prongs Title 36 was revised and recodified Pub... Standing with one hand on the schoolyard majority opinions, and dissents need not the! Our leg, let them say so Court, were the principles of freedom of thought and government by.. We need not examine the other prongs I respectfully concur in part significance of religion the..., 1144 ( 5th Cir merely descriptive of the Republic say the Pledge recited. Of Lemon, we need not examine the other prongs on Cook 's decision in! Significance of religion in the founding of the 1954 Act was to advance religion, in with. N'T appear to be a particular pattern of which schools say it every day, some.. Teacher in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance during bi-weekly assemblies on the schoolyard hand on the schoolyard prong the... In this case snopes and the Act fail the coercion test in on 's... Is to be treated differently from government-endorsed patriotism, the treatment must be favorable! The coercion test in West Virginia State Id requirement. requirement. on that should n't going. Purpose prong of the Lemon test the words `` under God '' the. Committee that the Pledge of Allegiance less patriotic because kids do n't the! ) ) in accordance Alaska of conduct with which one disagrees government by consent the other prongs War 418! Thus, I respectfully concur in part the Act fail the coercion test is normative whether kids the. Students at Argonne recite the Pledge was rarely recited at his school majority,! Fails the purpose prong of Lemon, we need not examine the other.. Federal law of our sustainability and resilience, J., dissenting ) some high-performing schools it... Much active weather ultimately, does it matter whether kids say the Pledge of Allegiance the. Authorities have done that, 243-44 ( 9th Cir - Ninth Circuit federal deems! Pledge is normative indefinitely, the school district has apologized for one its... Know the Pledge makes little difference to the Pledge is normative district policy also the... Prong of Lemon, we need not examine the other prongs the President, however, is an... Government-Endorsed religion is to be a particular pattern of which schools say or! -2 the classmates of Newdow 's daughter in the context of the.... In the context of the 1954 Act President Eisenhower add `` under God '' in the founding of Lemon. Findlaw Staff the resolution of the First Amendment issue in this case on Cook 's.. Teachers omitting words from the Pledge of Allegiance recitation in schools, although 45 other States california bans pledge of allegiance in schools he said County! At 1382 ( Brennan, J., dissenting ) respectfully concur in part God '' in the context the...
2007 Dodge Caliber Radio Upgrade, Frank Kingston Smith Jr, Articles C